Poster Presentation Australian Society for Microbiology Annual Scientific Meeting 2024

Seroprevalence of hepatitis B core antibody in Australian blood donors (#87)

Thilini Perera 1 , Amanda Lincoln 1 , Veronica Hoad 2 , Iain Gosbell 3 , Anthea Cheng 2 , Claire Styles 2 , Elvina Viennet 1 , Helen Faddy 4 , Robert Flower 1 , Eileen Roulis 1 , Lina Rustanti 1
  1. Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  2. Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Western Australia
  3. Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, New South Wales
  4. University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, Queensland

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes infection of the liver, with highest prevalence in the Western Pacific and African regions. HBV is known to be transfusion-transmissible (TT). Occult HBV (OBI) is a form of chronic HBV infection typically characterized by undetectable HBV surface antigen and very low levels of HBV DNA, but detectable antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). With individual donation nucleic acid amplification testing the risk of HBV TT is negligible, whilst the risk of OBI is significantly decreased with anti-HBc screening. A previous study estimated the deferral of anti-HBc positive donors would lead to the loss of ~2% of Australian donors. The latest calculated residual risk due to OBI infections is within the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood tolerable level of <1 in 1,000,000 components (Seed et al, Vox Sanguinis, 2019).

Aims: To provide a current estimate of the prevalence of anti-HBc in Australian blood donors. Determine the optimal testing strategy to ensure the HBV residual risk remains negligible, considering sufficiency and cost.

Methods: A national serosurvey of 10,000 Australian blood donors is being undertaken; Samples are assayed for anti-HBc II on the Abbott Alinity i instrument, with samples reactive for anti-HBc submitted for external confirmatory testing.  We include analysis of the first 1,901 donors, with samples processed in Queensland from July to September 2023. The rate of anti-HBc reactivity and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Proportions were compared using chi-squared test, with p< 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Preliminary results from 1,901 donors indicate 27 (1.42%, 95% CI: 0.89 – 1.95%) were anti-HBc initial reactive, with 24 (1.26%, 95% CI: 0.76 – 1.76%) confirmed for anti-HBc. The rate of confirmed anti-HBc was similar in first-time donors (11/958, 1.15%, 95% CI: 0.47 – 1.82%) and repeat donors (13/943, 1.38%, 95% CI: 0.63% - 2.12%) (p = 0.6537).

Conclusion: We show that 1.26% of donors from the state of Queensland, Australia had anti-HBc, which is slightly lower than expected (~2%). The findings will be used to underpin an accurate risk-based assessment of the impact of anti-HBc testing strategies, ensuring the safety of Australia’s blood supply.